Recent changes in the methamphetamine scene in New Zealand: Preliminary findings from key informant surveys of drug enforcement officers and drug treatment workers - New Zealand Police
Recent changes in the methamphetamine scene in New
Zealand:
Preliminary findings from key informant surveys of drug
enforcement officers and drug treatment workers
January 2004
C. Wilkins1, E. Rose1, D.Trappitt2, D. Sellman3, S. Adamson3 and K. DeZwart3
1 Centre for Social and Health Outcomes Research
and Evaluation (SHORE), Massey University, Auckland. www.shore.ac.nz
2 Police National Headquarters, New Zealand Police. www.police.govt.nz
3 National Addiction Centre, Christchurch School of
Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago. www.chmeds.ac.nz
Introduction - This document presents preliminary findings from key informant surveys of drug enforcement and drug treatment workers about how the methamphetamine scene in New Zealand has changed in the last six months. It is the first component of a larger study of the socio-economic impact of Amphetamine type Stimulants (ATS) commissioned by the New Zealand Police. The ATS project is funded by the New Zealand Police from money received from the Cross Departmental Research Funding Pool administered by the Ministry of Research Science and Technology (MoRST).
Acknowledgements - We would like to thank all the respondents to the key informant surveys without whom this research could not have taken place. The SHORE project team was led by Dr Chris Wilkins. Emily Rose assisted in the analysis of the findings and preparation of the presentation. Superintendent Dave Trappitt is the National Manager Planning, Policy and Evaluation at the Police National Headquarters, New Zealand Police, Wellington. Associate Professor Doug Sellman is the Director of the National Addiction Centre. Simon Adamson and Karen DeZwart worked on the National Addiction Centre Rolling Telephone Survey of drug treatment workers.
Component Aim: To provide a rapid assessment of how the methamphetamine situation in New Zealand has changed over the last six months.
Method: Drawing on the Rapid Assessment and Response (RAR) methodology key informant surveys were conducted nationwide with drug treatment workers and drug enforcement officers from Police and Customs in November and December of 2003. Drug enforcement key informants were selected by the National Drug Intelligence Bureau (NDIB) from officers with good knowledge of drug offending from all areas of the country. These included officers in drug squads, Criminal Investigation Bureau (CIB), National Drug Intelligence Bureau (NDIB), Customs, National Bureau Criminal Intelligence (NBCI), Organised Crime Units (OCU), clandestine laboratory teams, and officers in the undercover programme. Those selected were sent a questionnaire by post through the Evaluation Unit of the Commissioners Office with an attached letter of support from the Commissioner or Head of Customs as appropriate. Drug treatment worker key informants were respondents to the National Addiction Centres (NAC) national survey of drug treatment workers. In this survey, treatment workers are randomly selected from an up-dated list of all drug treatment workers in New Zealand. The methamphetamine key informant questions were included in the regular NAC interview. Drug treatment respondents were initially administered a telephone interview and then faxed additional questions for completion and return by fax. The key informant questionnaire was a mix of structured quantitative questions and open qualitative questions about changes in the use and sale of methamphetamine in the last six months. The response rate of the drug enforcement key informants was 74% (n=74). The response rate of the drug treatment key informants was 71% (n=48/37). This seminar presents some of the central findings of the key informant surveying. More detailed findings from this component will be presented in a written report to New Zealand Police when data collection and analysis from other components of the research project are complete.
Q.3 How do the methamphetamine users mostly take methamphetamine?
Drug enforcement key informants
83% smoking, 21% snorting, 14% injecting

Drug treatment key informants
77% smoking, 40% swallowing liquid, 36% snorting, 32% injecting

Q.4 Would the methamphetamine users you know of typically use Pure or ordinary methamphetamine powder?
Drug enforcement key informants
84% Pure, 31% ordinary

Drug treatment key informants
84% Pure, 40% ordinary

Q.5 Can you briefly describe the types of methamphetamine you have seized in the last six months and estimate their purity?
Drug enforcement key informants
79%Yes, 21% No seizures
|
Description |
% |
|
Clear/white crystals [70-85% pure] |
73 |
|
Methamphetamine powder [5-17% pure] |
37 |
|
Pure methamphetamine [50-85% pure] |
24 |
|
Methamphetamine liquid/oil [2-5% pure] [60% pure] |
6 |
|
Total |
140 |
Q.6a Have you noticed any change in the number of people using methamphetamine in the last six months?
Drug enforcement key informants
98% Increase, 2% No change

Q.6b Have you noticed any change in the number of people presenting for methamphetamine problems in the last six months?
Drug treatment key informants
80% Increase, 20% No change

Q.7 Have you noticed any change in the way users take methamphetamine in the last six months?
Drug enforcement key informants
68% Change, 32% No Change
|
Change |
% |
|
More smoking |
45 |
|
More intravenous use |
33 |
|
Smoking most common |
33 |
|
Less snorting |
5 |
|
Talk of intravenous use |
3 |
|
Small number of injectors |
3 |
|
Less injecting |
3 |
|
Total |
125 |
Drug treatment key informants
54% Change, 46% No Change
|
Change |
% |
|
More smoking |
67 |
|
More intravenous use |
27 |
|
More snorting |
7 |
|
More imported |
7 |
|
Total |
108 |
Q.8 How easy is it to get methamphetamine at the moment?
Drug enforcement key informants
55% Very easy, 40% Easy, 5% Difficult, 0% Very difficult

Drug treatment key informants
67% Very easy, 29% Easy, 2% Difficult, 2% Very difficult

Q.9 Is getting methamphetamine easier, harder or about the same compared to six months ago?
Drug enforcement key informants
75% Easier, 2% Harder, 24% Same

Drug treatment key informants
56% Easier, 10% Harder, 33% Same

Q.14 Have you noticed any new groups using methamphetamine?
Drug enforcement key informants
73% Yes, 27% No
|
Change |
% |
|
More younger people/students/teenagers |
33 |
|
More of cross section of society |
24 |
|
More business people |
9 |
|
More young females |
9 |
|
More Maori |
9 |
|
More middle class |
9 |
|
More 'boy racers' |
9 |
|
More users in general |
7 |
|
More lower socio-economic |
7 |
|
More traditional cannabis users |
7 |
|
More last teens early 30s |
4 |
|
More active criminals |
4 |
|
Other |
12 |
|
Total |
143 |
Drug treatment key informants
68% Yes, 32% No
|
Change |
% |
|
More younger |
46 |
|
More higher socio-economic/white collar/well educated |
31 |
|
More of all types |
15 |
|
More females |
15 |
|
More cannabis users |
8 |
|
More with poor injecting habits |
8 |
|
Total |
108 |
Q.15 Have you noticed any changes in the type of people selling methamphetamine in the last six months?
Drug enforcement key informants
60% Yes, 40% No
|
Change |
% |
|
Gangs have a wide influence |
32 |
|
Tinny houses switching to selling methamphetamine |
29 |
|
Heavy methamphetamine users dealing to sustain habit |
19 |
|
More young people/students selling |
16 |
|
More young females selling |
13 |
|
More ordinary people selling |
13 |
|
Previous cannabis dealers now selling methamphetamine |
10 |
|
Criminals selling |
6 |
|
Solo Mums |
3 |
|
Prostitutes |
3 |
|
Middle management |
3 |
|
Males last 20s/early 30s |
3 |
|
Middle class users |
3 |
|
Manufacturers |
3 |
|
Total |
156 |
Drug treatment key informants
53% Yes, 47% No
|
Change |
% |
|
More gangs |
30 |
|
More tinny house sales |
30 |
|
Cross section of society selling |
20 |
|
Younger addicts |
20 |
|
Less people dealing as many burnt out users |
10 |
|
Total |
110 |
Q.16 Have you noticed any changes in the way methamphetamine is being sold in the last six months?
Drug enforcement key informants
41% Change, 59% No change
|
Change |
% |
|
Tinny houses selling methamphetamine |
32 |
|
Sold in smaller weights than point called 'clicks' (0.07 gram) |
24 |
|
Dealers giving free taste to new users |
8 |
|
Dealers more careful who sell to now it is Class A |
8 |
|
Cannabis laced with methamphetamine |
8 |
|
Sold from meth houses |
8 |
|
Party packs (e.g. meth/ecstasy/LSD, meth/LSD/ecstasy/cannabis) |
8 |
|
Cannabis dealers witching to methamphetamine |
4 |
|
Methamphetamine sold with syringes |
4 |
|
More non-gang sellers |
4 |
|
Methamphetamine available from more places (e.g. bars/restaurants) |
4 |
|
Total |
112 |
Q.22 In the last six months, have you noticed any changes in the type of crime, if any, being committed by methamphetamine users?
Drug enforcement key informants
60% Change, 40% No change, 0% No crime
|
Change |
% |
|
More serious violence |
73 |
|
More theft/property crime |
29 |
|
More burglarly |
24 |
|
More domestic violence |
14 |
|
More theft of identity cards/fraud |
12 |
|
More use of weapons/firearms |
10 |
|
More car crime |
10 |
|
More aggravated robbery |
8 |
|
More chemist break ins |
6 |
|
More home invasion |
4 |
|
More kidnapping |
4 |
|
More solicitors stating clients using methamphetamine |
2 |
|
More rapes |
2 |
|
More disorderly conduct |
2 |
|
More road rage |
2 |
|
More drug deals gone wrong |
2 |
|
More shop lifting |
2 |
|
Total |
156 |
Drug treatment key informants
70% Change, 25% No change, 5% No crime
|
Change |
% |
|
More violence |
36 |
|
More burglary/property crime/theft |
36 |
|
More desperation crime/anything to get money for drugs |
29 |
|
More complex fraud |
7 |
|
More drug dealing by users |
7 |
|
More publicity of methamphetamine crime |
7 |
|
More crime by women |
7 |
|
More crime in general |
7 |
|
Total |
110 |
Q.23 In the last six months, have you noticed any changes in the level of drug dealing, if any, being committed by methamphetamine users?
Drug enforcement key informants
19% No change, 0% Less drug dealing, 81% More drug dealing, 0% No drug dealing

Drug treatment key informants
32% No change, 5% Less drug dealing, 58% More drug dealing, No drug dealing, 5%

Q.24 In the last six months, have you noticed any changes in the level of violence, if any, being committed by methamphetamine users?
Drug enforcement key informants
85% Change, 15% No change, 0% No violence
|
Change |
% |
|
More serious violence |
40 |
|
More domestic violence |
26 |
|
More kidnapping |
11 |
|
More use of weapons/firearms |
11 |
|
Unpredictable behaviour/violence |
11 |
|
Violence to recover drug debts |
11 |
|
More drug deals gone wrong |
4 |
|
Violent rape |
4 |
|
Irrational violence |
4 |
|
More unprovoked stranger violence |
2 |
|
Home invasions |
2 |
|
Bar fights |
2 |
|
Aggravated robbery |
2 |
|
Serious assaults |
2 |
|
Child abuse |
2 |
|
More violent drug offences |
2 |
|
Total |
136 |
Key Trends
-
The popularity of smoking methamphetamine as opposed to the previous tradition of snorting
-
The emergence of injecting methamphetamine
-
The prevalence of pure crystal forms of methamphetamine as opposed to cut powder
-
Increased number of methamphetamine users coming to the attention of Police and drug treatment
-
The easy availability of methamphetamine
-
Greater cross section of society now using methamphetamine
-
Sale of methamphetamine from cannabis tinny houses
-
Marketing of methamphetamine to lower socio-economic groups
-
Violence and property crime associated methamphetamine use
-
Increased drug dealing by methamphetamine users
-
Serious violence and domestic violence associated with methamphetamine


