The Police reject any suggestion that improper decisions were taken in the Edwards burglary case.
Any speculation as to whether or not a prosecution in this matter would have succeeded is not helpful, nor is it helpful to speculate on what sentence might have been imposed.
The Police do not wish to go into the details of the case as the person involved is still before the Courts. Sentencing has yet to take place and there is the possibility of an appeal.
However, the Police can confirm three things.
First, the Police consider that there was a burglary and the Police did speak to Edwards about the matter.
Second, in making a decision to prosecute a matter such as this, the wishes of the victim are taken into consideration. Victims have rights and Police have a duty to consider those rights seriously. In this case, the Police received strong representations from the victim and his representative not to pursue this matter. Out of respect for his rights, Police took the decision not to proceed with a prosecution. No other party was involved in the decision not to proceed with criminal proceedings.
Third, decisions not to proceed with criminal matters are never taken lightly by the Police. Police dealt with this matter on the same basis as they deal with other matters – no special approach was taken or suggested. The decisions and actions involved in this case are entirely consistent with normal Police practice; to exercise judgment and discretion in a fair manner.
Detective Superintendent Gavin Jones
Acting District Commander
Auckland City Police