| Agency responsible | New Zealand Police |
|---|---|
| Portfolio | Police |
| Date finalised | 22 September 2026 |
| Identification Number | REG-2390 |
Good law-making: 9(i)
| The importance of consulting, to the extent that is reasonably practicable, the persons or representatives of the persons that the responsible agency considers will be directly and materially affected by the legislation |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
The Gangs Act 2024 (the Act) includes a power that allows the Governor-General to amend the list of identified gangs covered by the legislation, by Order in Council made on the recommendation of the Minister of Police, if the statutory criteria are met. To be listed as a gang, a group must, under section 32(2) of the Act, meet all the following criteria:
The Justice Committee considered the statutory criteria during their examination of the Gangs legislation. Many submitters on the Bill were concerned that the test to be identified as a gang under the Bill was not stringent enough. Following consideration of the submissions the Committee made a number of changes to the test, including a requirement: 1 Category 3: An offence punishable by two years’ imprisonment or more (such as aggravated assault) and excluding the offences listed as Category 4 in Schedule 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011, as defined in section 6(1). |
Good law-making: 9(j)
The importance of carefully evaluating—
|
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
The Gangs Act enables additional groups to be added to the list of identified gangs in Schedule 2 of the Act, if the statutory criteria are met. The gangs listed in Schedule 2 are subject to the provisions of the Act that:
There are no non-legislative options that would enable members of the Never Snitch Krew to be subject to these provisions. Public interest has been considered. The Order is intended to reduce the ability of gangs to operate and cause fear, intimidation and disruption to the public and to improve public confidence in law and order. |
Good law-making: 9(k)
| The importance of the responsible agency identifying and developing effective arrangements for implementing the legislation |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Police has already effectively implemented the Gangs legislation for over 30 identified gangs. Implementation of the Gangs (Identified Gangs) Order 2026 can be managed within existing systems and baselines. Police will liaise with the Never Snitch Krew gang leadership in advance of the Order coming into effect to ensure the gang and its supporters are aware that the gang is being added to Schedule 2 of the Gangs Act. |
Good law-making: 9(l)
| Legislation should be expected to produce benefits that exceed the costs of the legislation to the public or persons |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
There are benefits and costs to the Gangs legislation. Police has incurred an opportunity cost from enforcing the Gang legislation, as opposed to investigating or taking enforcement action against other offending. The Ministry of Justice and Courts have incurred the costs of additional prosecutions, legal aid and proceedings that arise from charges of an offence. The Ministry of Justice has incurred the cost of collecting fines under the Gangs Act. The benefits of the Gang legislation are a reduction in the ability of gangs to operate and cause fear and to intimidate and disrupt the public and improved public confidence in law and order. Adding Never Snitch Krew to the list of identified gangs under the Gangs Act will reduce the ability of this gang to cause fear, intimidation and disruption to the public. It is expected to have minimal additional opportunity costs for Police and minimal costs to the Ministry of Justice and Courts given the Never Snitch Krew gang currently only has 25 validated members. |
Good law-making: 9(m)
| Legislation should be the most effective, efficient, and proportionate response to the issue concerned that is available |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
| Using the existing legislative mechanism to add the Never Snitch Krew to the list of identified gangs under the Gangs Act is the most effective and efficient way to reduce the ability of the gang to operate and cause intimidation and disruption to the public. |
Rule of Law: 9(a)(i)
| The law should be clear and accessible |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
The Gangs (Identified Gangs) Order will be gazetted and Schedule 2 of the Gangs Act updated. The Gazette Notice and Act are publicly available online. As noted under 9(k), Police will liaise with the Never Snitch Krew gang leadership in advance of the Order coming into effect to ensure the gang and its supporters are aware of the consequences of being added to Schedule 2 of the Act. |
Rule of Law: 9(a)(ii)
| The law should not adversely affect rights and liberties, or impose obligations, retrospectively |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
| The Gangs (Identified Gangs) Order 2026 is consistent with this principle. |
Rule of Law: 9(a)(iii)
| Every person is equal before the law |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
| No one is permitted to publicly display the insignia of identified gangs listed under Schedule 2 of the Gangs Act. |
Rule of Law: 9(a)(iv)
| There should be an independent impartial judiciary |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Rule of Law: 9(a)(v)
| Issues of legal right and liability should be resolved by the application of law, rather than the exercise of administrative discretion |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Liberties: 9(b)
| Legislation should not unduly diminish a person’s liberty, personal security, freedom of choice or action, or rights to own, use, and dispose of property, except as is necessary to provide for, or protect, any such liberty, freedom, or right of another person |
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Under the Gangs Act:
The provisions of the Gangs legislation were designed to limit rights no more than is reasonably necessary to respond to gang harm and improve public confidence in law and order. The prohibitions on display of gang insignia in public and gathering in public do not unduly diminish gang members from assembling or associating with each other. They can associate in private, wearing gang insignia, and in public, not wearing gang insignia, provided they do not disrupt the activities of other members of the community. |
Taking of property: 9(c)
Legislation should not take or severely impair, or authorise the taking or severe impairment of, property without the consent of the owner unless-
|
| Inconsistency identified? NO |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Under the Gangs Act, if a person pleads guilty to, or is convicted of, displaying gang insignia in a public place, the insignia is forfeited to the Crown. Forfeiture is justified on the basis that it is a direct result of the individual committing an illegal activity (displaying gang insignia in a public place). In addition, under the Act a court must make a gang insignia prohibition against repeat offenders. If a person with two previous convictions for display of gang insignia in a public place receives a subsequent conviction within five years, they will receive a gang insignia prohibition order. Being subject to an order means that a person cannot possess or control gang insignia and that gang insignia cannot be present at the person’s usual place of residence. The gang insignia prohibition is designed to incentivise compliance with the public display prohibition. |
Taxes, fees and levies: 9(d)
| The importance of maintaining consistency with section 22(a) of the Constitution Act 1996 (Parliamentary control of taxation) |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Taxes, fees and levies: 9(e)
| Legislation should impose, or authorise the imposition of, a fee for goods or services only if the amount of the fee bears a proper relation to the cost of providing the good or service to which it relates |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Taxes, fees and levies: 9(f)
Legislation should impose, or authorise the imposition of, a levy to fund an objective or a function only if the amount of the levy is reasonable in relation to both— • the benefits that the class of payers is likely to derive, or the risks attributable to the class, in connection with the objective or function; and |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Role of courts: 9(g)
| Legislation should preserve the courts’ constitutional role of ascertaining the meaning of legislation |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |
Role of courts: 9(h)
| Legislation should make rights and liberties, or obligations, dependent on administrative power only if the power is sufficiently defined and subject to appropriate review |
| Inconsistency identified? NOT APPLICABLE |
| Summary of agency analysis |