Appendix 6 of the Crewe Review is the opinion of Solicitor-General Paul Neazor QC as to the prosecution of Bruce Hutton which formed a part of the review into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Appendix 15 of the Crewe Review is the 1980 Report of the Royal Commission into the conviction of Arthur Allan Thomas in relation to the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Appendix 14 of the Crewe Review are two reports by Mr Robert Adams-Smith QC which outline the investigation into certain aspects of evidence relating to the murder conviction of Arthur Allan Thomas. These two reports were used as part of the review into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Appendix 13 of the Crewe Review is the 2013 report by the Criminal Profiling Unit undertaken as part of the review into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
The report is a criminal profile of the perpetrator(s) responsible for murders, and includes sections on:
Appendix 12 of the Crewe Review is the 2013 report into the analysis of the wire samples by Professor George Ferguson as part of the review into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
The report looks at five key elements of the wire analysis, including:
Appendix 11 of the Crewe Review is an extract from 'The New Zealand .22 Rimfire' (2000), by Barry Gracia and Kevan Walsh, relevant to the investigation into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Appendix 10 of the Crewe Review contains the Forensic Findings of Rory SHANAHAN, M.Sc., Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) completed as part of the investigation into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
The two reports are:
Appendix 9 of the Crewe Review is a thesis written by Christopher Price to fulfil the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Forensic Science. The thesis references the investigation into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
Introduction to the Thesis
During the prosecution of Mr Arthur Allan Thomas for the Crewe murders (1970), an important element of the judicial proceedings involved a consideration of the link between the fatal bullets recovered from the victims and a cartridge case which was recovered from the crime scene.
In order to determine the production period for the questioned cartridge case, an analysis was conducted of the design features of the headstamp. There was considerable debate about how the statistical analysis should be performed and further debate on the findings from various analyses.
However, the general conclusion suggested that no link could be provided between the fatal bullets and the crime scene cartridge case. For this project it was proposed to further investigate the design features of the headstamp in order to determine whether or not it was possible to define a more specific time period of manufacture.
Appendix 8 of the Crewe Review contains seven ballistics reports completed as part of the investigation into the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
The seven reports have been completed over a period of time between 1972 and 2014.
Appendix 7 of the Crewe Review covers the assessment of the pathology reports, by Dr Ian Morrow, regarding the deaths of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe.
The appendix includes the original assessment of the pathology reports completed in 2013, and an addendum to the assessment.